Written by Carrie Schmelkin
Monday, 28 December 2009 07:31
In a decision filed November 10, the Connecticut Supreme Court agreed with local attorney Richard C. Stewart and reversed an Appellate Court ruling adverse to his client, the plaintiff in Kaczynski v. Kaczynski. In doing so, the Supreme Court overruled two prior long-standing Appellate decisions.
Stewart, who has practiced law in New Canaan since 1982 and is an officer, director and shareholder in his family-owned business Walter Stewart’s Market, had replaced the plaintiff’s initial attorney just before trial in a divorce case pending in the Bridgeport courthouse. He immediately filed an amended complaint alleging that he had discovered a series of fraudulent transactions by the defendant husband in the case.
After a six-day trial, the trial judge agreed with Stewart and included three sizeable assets in its decision, which the defendant husband had claimed he did not own. The defendant appealed, and in a split decision, the Connecticut Appellate Court reversed the trial court’s decision on the narrow grounds that the trial court had not explicitly stated that by “clear and convincing evidence” it found the included assets to have been fraudulently transferred.
Stewart then successfully petitioned for certiorari, a request that the Connecticut Supreme Court review the decision of the Appellate Court. The Supreme Court reversed the Appellate Court, and also overruled seven Connecticut Appellate Court decisions dating back to 1984.
Stewart argued that the old rule requiring a trial judge state explicitly that the higher standard of proof had been employed was too technical and inappropriate in divorce cases. The Connecticut Supreme Court agreed, and articulated a new rule that presumes a trial judge used the correct standard of proof unless a litigant specifically asks the court which burden of proof it was applying, and the standard of proof it stated it was applying was erroneous.
Commenting that while he was of course “gratified that my client’s divorce award had been reinstated” Stewart added he was “also pleased, on a professional level, that what had been an overly technical rule, especially in the context of divorce litigation, had finally been erased. I thought the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision was well reasoned, correct, and very much needed. Historically they only accept about one in five petitions for certiorari. It was important that they did so here to correct a flaw in existing family case law”.
Stewart served on the New Canaan Town Council for 12 years, and was recognized with his twin brother two years ago as the New Canaan Gridiron “Fall Guy.” He is a New Canaan High School graduate, tri-captain of the 1960 state championship football team and a former member of the Republican Town Committee.
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
'Danger of Raising Nice Kids' topic of parent workshop
Hands-on workshop explores life’s structure,purpose
Outback Teen Center sets 3-D movie night
Inter-faith women's conference is family-centered
Lenten performance: Choir presents ‘Requiem’
‘Sacred Walk’ book explores caregiving
Crime author to share, sign copies of new thriller
Reach Dance Project sets annual benefit concert
Conference about families is next week
Bank’s latest exhibit features Fog’s work
Tuscany transplant to discuss her book
Country School alumni get nomination
Wine tasting benefits scholarship foundation
Presentation discusses school's future
Birth order is topic of lecture
Nature center plans Syrup Sunday